Why Does Michigan’s Strict Liability Law Beat Most States’ for Victims?

Michigan is among the very best states for dog bite victims. Understanding why helps you understand what your case is actually worth.

The Short Answer

Michigan’s MCL 287.351 is among the most plaintiff-friendly dog bite statutes in the country. It eliminates the “one-bite” defense, doesn’t require proving owner negligence, and applies whether the dog was on the owner’s property or in public. Many states still require victims to prove the owner knew the dog was dangerous — a high evidentiary bar Michigan has rejected. The practical result: Michigan dog bite cases settle for more and resolve faster than they would in most other states.

Video coming soon — Solomon Radner answers this question

The Detailed Answer

U.S. dog bite law falls into three broad categories: pure one-bite states (worst for victims), mixed states (middle ground), and strict liability states (best for victims). Michigan is firmly in the strict liability camp — and within that camp, it’s one of the most plaintiff-friendly versions.

Category 1: One-bite states (e.g., Texas, New York)

One-bite states require victims to prove that the owner knew their dog was dangerous before the bite occurred. The victim must usually produce:

Evidence of a prior bite or aggressive incident
Proof that the owner knew about that prior incident
Proof that the owner failed to take precautions

This is hard to do. Many victims with legitimate claims lose because they can’t prove what the dog owner knew. Texas, New York (with some exceptions), and Virginia are notable one-bite states.

Category 2: Mixed states (e.g., Ohio)

Mixed states have strict liability for some categories of cases (often public places or specific victim types) but require negligence proof for others. Ohio has a strict liability statute, but its provocation and trespass defenses are broader than Michigan’s. The result is more contested cases and lower average settlements than in Michigan.

Category 3: Strict liability states (Michigan)

Michigan applies strict liability cleanly under MCL 287.351. The victim proves three elements:

A dog bit them
They were lawfully present
They did not provoke the dog

The owner’s knowledge, negligence, and the dog’s history are all irrelevant. This is one of the strongest plaintiff-friendly framings in the country.

Why Michigan’s case values are higher

Insurance companies value cases based on probability of liability times expected damages. In a one-bite state, even strong damages cases get discounted because there’s a real chance liability fails. In Michigan, liability is almost a foregone conclusion — so the entire value of the case becomes the damages negotiation. This drives settlements meaningfully higher.

What This Means for Your Case

If you’ve moved to Michigan from a one-bite state, or if you’re comparing your case to one a friend had in another state, the Michigan framework is fundamentally different. The same injury that might be uncompensable in Virginia or Texas is straightforwardly recoverable in Michigan. The legal context you’re operating in matters more than most victims realize.

Bitten by a dog in Michigan? Call 1-800-LAWSUIT or request a free case review. No fee unless we win.